Whether as a result of protected conversations, disciplinary or capability processes, grievances or tribunal proceedings, as an employer you may find yourself engaged in ‘negotiations to settle’ with current or former employees. Employees may allege that they have suffered an “injury to feelings” as a result of what they see as unlawful treatment, and settlement monies may be apportioned between financial losses, legal fees, and pre- and post-termination injury to feelings, to take advantage of the tax rules.
Articles
Articles by ‘Richard White’
Our client was a director being made redundant who wanted to get everything done as quickly as possible. After reviewing the settlement agreement we successfully negotiated a number of key changes as follows:
Do you transfer customer data to the United States as part of your business? If you do, you should be aware of the recent European Court of Justice decision.
As you know the minimum hourly rate most workers are entitled to is reviewed each year by the Low Pay Commission.
Do you have employees who work on different client sites as an integral part of their role? If so, in an important legal case in Europe, a ruling is due which is likely to say that travel to and from sites may count as working time – meaning employees should be paid.
As we wait to see what legislative changes lie ahead in the wake of the general election, the ban on exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts has already come into force.
Two important employment law changes came into force over the Easter weekend.
It’s the norm for office workers to be based in open plan offices, often in close proximity to fellow employees. To deal with the inevitable grumbles and occasional tensions, employers often have policies relating to loud chit-chat, eating hot food at desks, and many provide break-out facilities. But what about employees who use their desk or place of work to put on make-up or perfume or aerosol-based products? Could this have an adverse affect on those with allergies? And what of dissemination in the air of potentially alcohol based products to co-workers?
Many contracts of employment aim to stop departing employees from poaching customers and key staff. Such restrictions are legally allowed, providing that they are necessary to protect the business and do not unfairly restrict the ex-employee. With these restrictions employee and employer usually know where they stand… at least they did until fairly recently.
The recent case of Jackson Lloyd and Mears Group v Smith is a reminder that it isn’t always safe to assume that TUPE doesn’t apply to share transfers.
The Court of Appeal’s recent decision in McMillan v Airedale NHS Foundation Trust shows that employers can’t increase disciplinary sanctions on appeal, unless their disciplinary policy says otherwise.
RWK Goodman employment law experts bring you an update on the legal case where the European Court of Justice was being asked to assess whether holiday pay must now contain rolled-up commission payments to compensate for the employee’s inability to earn commission during the period of leave.